John R. Cohn, a Clinical Professor of Medicine at Thomas Jefferson University, and a participant in the recent Herzliya Conference on The Balance of Israel’s National Security, wrote a very compelling letter to the editor of The Bulletin, discussing the Muslim world’s so-called claim on the Holy City of Jerusalem, located in what some would call “Occupied Palestine.” This letter sparked from a recent BBC article by Matthew Sparks, a 34-year old journalist who covered the oft and recent violent outbursts in the Old City over the building of a new ramp up to Temple Mount. If you don’t recall the story, The State of Israel had built a tempoary wooden ramp (the same wooden ramp in the picture on this blog’s headline) awhile back to replace the old ramp that was damaged in a snowstorm. Since then, the wooden ramp has been dismantled and excavations have begun at the base of Temple Mount, in Jerusalem Archeological Park, for the footers for the new ramp. Muslim governments around the Middle East raised arms in protests, claiming that the excavations and new ramp building was just a cover for the real work. The real work, of course, being the plan by the State of Israel to tunnel underneath Temple Mount and implode the Dome of the Rock from the inside; all this of course, to usher in the rebuilding of the New Temple (it’s silly on both sides – the Jews have already rebuilt the Temple, it’s just in the New City and not on a hill). And of course, nevermind the fact that the very architecture of Temple Mount makes the idea of tunneling underneath it absolutely ridiculous (it’s a massive flat surface built onto a hill, supported by a series of King Herod-era arches and waterways). Anyway, off track, but back to story about why the Muslim’s don’t have that much of a claim to Jerusalem, according to history books.
It’s gotten almost to the point of complete hyperbole on all sides, but this is what the Cohn had to say in one portion of his letter:
“So does Matthew Price and the BBC find it not the least bit curious that Jerusalem, which was the Jews’ most holy city and capital long before the birth of Mohammed, is thought by “most of the world” to belong to anyone else but Israel?
It can’t be because the world and protesting Muslims love the Palestinians. The United Nations Relief and Work Agency for Palestinian Refugees (UNRWA) recently reported that only 3 percent of their funds for Palestinian refugee relief comes from Arabs states.
It can’t be because they love Jerusalem. Jerusalem was a backwater for centuries. In 2001, Iran’s influential Ayatollah Ali Akbar Hashemi-Rafsanjani observed, “If a day comes when the world of Islam is duly equipped with the arms Israel has in possession, the strategy of colonialism would face a stalemate because application of an atomic bomb would not leave any thing in Israel but the same thing would just produce damages in the Muslim world.”
It can’t be because of Christianity’s recorded history. If Jesus lived and preached in Jerusalem, so did his fellow Jews.
Muslims are willing to destroy Jerusalem, and their Palestinian brothers and sisters, if they can take Israel along. Presumably a BBC reporter needs no reminder that Islamic radicals are willing to die if they can take others with them.
Could it be none of that matters – that much of the world rejects Israel’s remarkably benevolent rule over that holy city not because they love Jerusalem or the Palestinians, but because they just don’t want it to belong to the Jews?”
Read the full article at the link above, and let’s discuss. I’m a bit more interested in this now, as I just received word that I’ll be traveling there again on a writing assignment – a week in Damascus, a week in Beirut, a brief layover in Greece, capped off with two weeks in Jerusalem. I can’t discuss why now, but soon. Interesting times…